Oldur ki; Lefkoşa muzâfâtından Lurucine nâm karye sükkânından Kostanti veled‑i Laryo nâm zimmî mahfil‑i kazâda ikrâr edüp târîh‑i kitâbdan altı sene mukaddem mezbûr Mahmud Beşe'ye ma‘lûmetü'l‑hudûd dört bâb evlerimi bey‘ edüp on sikke altun aldım dediği kayd şod.

Fî evâhir‑i Şa‘bân sene 1019. (15.11.1610)

Şuhûdü'l‑hâl: Sinan Beşe, Mehmed Bey, Mustafa Çelebi.

KŞMS, s. 172, hüküm 1075* KŞMS = Kıbrıs Şeri’yye Mahkeme Sicilli   s. = sayfa (page)

It is as follows:

Kostanti, son of Laryo, a non-Muslim Christian (dhimmi) residing in the village of Louroujina, within the administrative jurisdiction of Nicosia, appeared before the court and declared:

“Six years prior to the date of this document, I sold to the aforementioned Mahmud Beşe my four houses, whose boundaries are known, and received ten gold coins.”

The said declaration was duly recorded.

Date: In the latter days of the month of Sha‘ban, in the year 1019 AH (Hijri), corresponding to 15 November 1610.

Witnesses present at the judicial hearing:

• Sinan Beşe

• Mehmed Bey

• Mustafa Çelebi

Notes on terminology

• Dhimmi (ذمّي): A non-Muslim subject living under Muslim political authority and protection.

• Mahmud Beşe: The title Beşe is rendered here as “Bey” for readability, although it is a distinct Ottoman honorific or designation.

• Dört bâb evler: Literally, “four houses” or “four dwellings.” The word bâb means “door” and was also used in Ottoman documents to refer to an individual house or residential unit.

• On sikke altun: Ten gold coins. The document does not explicitly identify the type or denomination of the coins.

Historical note: There is a slight chronological discrepancy. The date of 15 November 1610 corresponds approximately to the latter part of Sha‘ban 1019 AH, whereas the reference to a sale “six years earlier” places the transaction around 1604–1605. The document does not provide a more precise date for the earlier transaction.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Oldur ki; Tuzla Kazâsı'na tâbi‘ ve Vadile nâm karye sâkinlerinden Pedridi nâm zimmî Luricine nâm karye sâkinlerinden Kostantinidi veled‑i Ladye nâm zimmî muvâcehesinde takrîr‑i kelâm kılup mezbûr Kostantinidi benim mülk evim satmış su’âl olunmasın taleb ederin dedikde gıbbe's‑su’âl merkûm Kostantinidi cevâb verüp eğer mezbûr Pedridi sipâhîleri rencîde eder ise ben evinin bahâsın veririn dedikde mâ vaka‘a bi't‑taleb kayd şod.

Şuhûdü'l‑hâl: Mehmed Kethüdâ emîn‑i Mahkeme, Muhzırbaşı, Mustafa Bey, Mehmed Beşe yasakcı ve gayruhum.

KŞMS, s. 167, hüküm 1049

[16 Şaban 1019] (2.11.1610)

Translation by Artificial Intelligence.

It is as follows:

Pedridi, a non-Muslim Christian (dhimmi) residing in the village of Vadili, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Tuzla district, appeared before Kostantinidi, son of Ladye, a non-Muslim Christian and resident of the village of Louroujina, and made the following statement:

“The aforementioned Kostantinidi has sold my privately owned house. I request that he be questioned and examined regarding this act.”

Upon being questioned following the complaint, the aforementioned Kostantinidi replied:

“If the aforementioned Pedridi causes trouble for the sipahis, I will pay the price of his house.”

At the request of the interested party, the foregoing circumstances were recorded.

Witnesses present at the judicial hearing

• Mehmed Kethüda, emîn-i mahkeme (an official responsible for the administration or supervision of the court).

• Muhzırbaşı, the chief of the court attendants or summons officers.

• Mustafa Bey.

• Mehmed Beşe, yasakçı (an official responsible for maintaining order or enforcing administrative instructions).

• And others.

Historical and terminological notes

• Dhimmi (zimmî): A non-Muslim subject living under Muslim political authority.

• Sipahis (sipâhîler): Ottoman cavalrymen who were often associated with the collection of revenues from lands assigned to them.

• “If Pedridi causes trouble for the sipahis”: This wording suggests that the sale of the house may have been connected with a matter or dispute involving the sipahis. However, the document does not specify the nature of the dispute or explain why Kostantinidi undertook to pay the value of the property.

• “I will pay the price of his house”: This statement suggests that Kostantinidi was assuming financial responsibility for the value of the property. Nevertheless, the document does not clarify whether the sale had already been completed or whether the purchase price had been paid to the owner.

Note: The date of the record is given as 16 Sha‘ban 1019 AH. The corresponding Gregorian date is not specified here.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Tuzla Kazâsı'na tâbi‘ Vadile nâm karyeden Petridi veled‑i Simyo nâm zimmî Lefkoşa muzâfâtından Luricine nâm karye ahâlîsinden Kosta ve[led‑i] Papa Dimitri ve Kosta veled‑i Layo ve İlyandi veled‑i Laryo ve gayrılar muvâcehesinde bast‑ı merâm edüp karye‑i mezbûre Luricine'de vâki‘ bir tarafı Fesinco ve bir tarafı Elyasi ve tarafeyni tarîk‑ı âmma müntehî dört bâb tahtânî evler havlısı ve iki incir ağacıyla târîh‑i kitâbdan on iki sene mukaddem karye‑i merkûmede sâkin olup zevcem Floro bint‑i Aleksandri nâm zimmiyenin babası mezbûr Aleksandri zevcem mezbûreye cihaz nâmıyla verüp tahliye ve teslîm edüp tasarrufumda iken ehl‑i karye zikr olunan evleri mezbûr Aleksandri'nindir deyü zevcem mezbûrenin zimmetinde olmağla târîh‑i kitâbdan üç sene mukaddem Kostanti veled‑i Laryo nâm zimmî ve mezbûr Kostanti dahi karye‑i mezbûrede sâkin Mahmud Beşe nâm kimesneye bey‘ eylemişdir hâlâ menzil‑i mezbûru taleb ederim su’âl olunsun dedikde gıbbe's‑su’âl akîbü'l‑inkâr Ceryako veled‑i Yakomo ve Kostanti veled‑i Piyero nâm zimmîler âgâh olup li‑ecli'ş‑şehâde mahfil‑i kazâya hâzırân olup fi'l‑hakîka mersûm Aleksandri bizim huzûrumuzda menzil‑i merkûmu kızı mezbûre Flori'ye cihâz nâmına hîbe ve temlîk ve teslîm edüp ol dahi ittihâb ve tesellüm edüp bu husûsa şâhidiz şehâdet dahi ederiz dediklerinde menzil‑i merkûm mezbûre Flori'ye hükm olunup hâzihi'l‑vesîkatü'l‑enîka bi't‑taleb ketb olundu.

Şuhûdü'l‑hâl: Cafer Bey, Süleyman Bey, Mehmed Ağa.

KŞMS, s. 172, hüküm 1074

[29 Şaban 1019]

Petridi, son of Simyo, a non-Muslim Christian (dhimmi) and resident of the village of Vadili in the judicial district of Tuzla, brought a case before the court in Nicosia against Kosta, son of Papa Dimitri; Kosta, son of Layo; Ilyandi, son of Laryo; and other residents of the village of Louroujina.

Petridi stated that twelve years before the date of the document, his father-in-law, Aleksandri, had granted and donated the disputed property to his daughter, Floro, Petridi’s wife, as her dowry. The property consisted of:

• Four single-storey houses with a courtyard.

• Two fig trees.

• A property situated in the village of Louroujina, bounded by neighbouring properties and with two sides extending to a public road.

According to the plaintiff, the gift had been accompanied by the delivery and transfer of possession, and he and his wife had exercised rights over the property ever since. However, other villagers disputed Floro’s ownership, claiming that the houses belonged to her father, Aleksandri.

Petridi further stated that, three years before the date of the document, Kostanti, son of Laryo, had sold the aforementioned houses to Mahmud Beşe, a resident of Louroujina. For this reason, he requested that the court examine the case and recognise his wife’s rights to the property.

During the judicial proceedings, two Christian witnesses, Ceryako, son of Yakomo, and Kostanti, son of Piyero, testified that they had personally witnessed the donation. They confirmed that Aleksandri had donated and transferred ownership of the disputed property to his daughter, Floro, as her dowry, in their presence, and that she had accepted the gift and taken possession of the property.

On the basis of these witness testimonies, the court ruled that the disputed property belonged to Floro and issued the relevant legal document at the request of the interested party.

Witnesses present at the judicial hearing: Cafer Bey, Süleyman Bey, and Mehmed Ağa.

Historical Significance

This document provides valuable evidence of the practices of transferring real estate through dowries and gifts among Christian families in early seventeenth-century Ottoman Cyprus. It also demonstrates the role of the Ottoman court in resolving property disputes and the importance of witness testimony in establishing the validity of earlier transactions.

___________________________________________________________________

Many documents on this page are mostly in the Greek script from the Cyprus National Archives. Most have been shared by my friend Konstantinos Lambrou who is currently researching the history of the Linobambaki in Cyprus.

The Court reference documents are from the Girne National archives and research Institute in Kyrenia found during my search for the criminal court case relating to the murder of Hasan Mustafa 'Musti' 'Gondolisi' at Sefer Hacaro's wedding in 1884 by Bekir Ramadan 'Ikiz' from the Galaba family (The records states that the crime took place in a house. Most weddings during that period took place in homes). The event and date is recorded in the records of Ibrahim Tahsildar. Unfortunately that particular record was not found at the National archives due to some missing documents.

Lower down the page can be found a large and epic Biima (poem) by Mustafa Muzaffe

Minor Court cases involving people of Lurucina in the 1880's

Case No; 21. 24 November 1880.

Ali Mustafa (Agriculturalist). Guilty of carrying a gun without a licence.

Arresting officer, Mollah Mehmet Zaptieh

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 131 & 132. 16 May 1883

Youssouf Mustafa accused of stabbing. Sentenced to 6 months prison, starting from 22.05.1883

Witness Ziliha declined to give evidence 16.05.1883

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 200. 16 June 1883

Seidali Hussein assaulted a policeman. Sentenced to one month's prison.

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 204. 19 June 1883.

Ismail Ramadan accused of drawing a knife. Case dismissed

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 407. 20 September 1883

Ismail Ramadan accused of assault. Case dismissed.

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 559 8 November 1883.

Nicola Georghi of Peristerona accused

Ibrahim Mustafa & Suleiman Arif of theft of sheep

Appearances in court,

08.11.1883

15.11.1883

20.11.1883

Case dismissed

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 598. 20 November 1883.

Ali Patria/Petzi?? versus Yousouf Mustafa

Abusive language.

No appearance in court. Case dismissed.

________________________________________________________________

Case No; 633. 29 November 1883.

Theft of sheep

Ismail Ali of Arsos versus

1 Ahmet Ramadan of Bodamia

2 Ismail Ramadan of Bodamia

3 Ismail Ramadan of Louroujina

4 Halil Said Ali

5 Osman Makouta?

Commited for trial to the District court on 18 December 1883

Ismail Ramadan Pattas of Bodamia was dismissed

Ismail Ramadan of Louroujina sentenced to 6 months and £1.5 shillings,6pence fine

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 644. 29 November 1883 & 6 December 1883

Theft of sheep

Nicola Georghi of Tremetousha versus Hussein Karaismail

Case dismissed

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 654. 4 December 1883

Disobeying an order of a police officer.

1 Osman Mustafa fined 5 shillings

2 Mustafa Moustakali fined 5 shillings

3 Yusuf Matzori? dismissed

4 Ali Mehmet fined 5 shillings

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 700. 18 December 1883

Damage to roads

Fedai Ali Mudur of Degirmenlik versus

1 Ismail Ibrahim

2 Bekir Onbashi

3 Yousouf Said Ali

Case dismissed

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 118. 7 February 1884

shooting without a licence

Police versus

Said Ali 'Siliono'.

Sentence could not be read due to damaged documents.

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 173 19 February 1884

Theft of sheep.

Sentenced to 9 months prison commencing 28.02.1884 (name could not be read

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 225 4 March 1884

Housebreaking

Hasan Mustafa. Case dismissed

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 271 25 March 1884

Trespass

Osman Pirilli versus Ibrahim Ramadileri

Ibrahim fined 10 shillings

________________________________________________________________

Case No; 274 25 March 1884

Trespass

Osman Halil & Petri Yorghi versus Hussein Latiffe?

Fined ten shillings paid on 25 March 1884

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 318 01.04.1884

Trespass and 5 flocks (sheep)

Ali Camilari versus Costanti Sava

No appearance, Case dismissed.

__________________________________________________________________

Case 557 26 June 1884

Assaulting a policeman

Hasan Mustafa sentenced to 14 days in prison.

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 632 15 July 1884

Resisting a policeman in execution of writ No; 191.

1 Mehmet Ramadan

2 Ali Mora'li

3 Hasan Mustafa

4 Mehmet Camilari

Case dismissed

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 633 15 July 1884

resisting police in execution of writ No;192.

1 Mustafa Ibrahim

2 Ibrahim Ramadan

3 Said Ali Kavaz

4 Mehmet Hassan

5 Yousouf Calchan (Kalkan)

Case dismissed.

__________________________________________________________________

Case No; 724 12 August 1884

Insult

Arif Yousouf versus Ibrahim Mustafa

No appearance, Case dismissed.

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 1494 11 September 1884

Assault

Yannis Kekki of Kaymakli versus Petro Khalou

No appearance result of case not known

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 1834. 23 December 1884

Theft of cereals,

Papa Yanni Papa Yorghi

versus

1 Said Ali Mustafa

2 Ibrahim Mustafa

3 Mustafa Ibrahim

4 Ismail Carpasiti (Karpazli)

Accused 1, 2, & 3 commited to trial before the Assize. Accused No; 4 acquitted

Trial took place on 3 March 1885 they were fined 264 piastres & 16 shillings for the costs of the witness.

________________________________________________________________

Case No; 1985 5 September 1985

Insult

Mehmet Mustafa versus Lambri Petri

Verdict not known

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 480. 17 September 1885

Theft of sheep

Yusuf Halil versus Hasan Moustafuri

Witnesses Ismail Moustafa & Ahmet Osman

Yusuf Halil fined 8 and a half shillings.

________________________________________________________________

Case No; 715 22 December 1885

Insult

Emine Hussein versus Yusuf Moustafa

Witnesses. Halil Seit Ali & Mouskli Ibrahim

Yusuf Mustafa fined 8 and a half shillings

________________________________________________________________

Case No; 1205. 11 August 1886

House breaking on the 10 August 1886.

Osman Suleyman versus Pargama Hussein (name not very clear on original document)

Witnesses. Seferis Suleyman & Hassan Hussein

Pargama Hussein fined 2 shillings.

________________________________________________________________

Case No; 1365 11 October 1886

Assault.

Muskli Ibrahim accused Yousouf Ali Yallitsi of assault on the 9 October 1886.

Witnesses. Bourountis Houssein & Suleyman Ibrahim

Yousouf Ali Yallitsi fined 2 shillings on the 23 October 1886

_________________________________________________________________

Case No; 1377. 16 October 1886.

Assault

Ali Mehmet of Potamyia accused Yousouf Ibrahim of Louroujina of assault on the 14 October 1886.

Witnesses. Salih Kara Houssein & Yanni Papaoriyi Papaoji of Nissu

Yousouf Ibrahim fined 2 shillings on the 30 October 1886.

___________________________________________________________________

The documents numbered below and the Ottoman dictionary on the left side of the screen were prepared and sourced at the KKTC Near East University in 2004

Sayfa No: 4

Dava No: 338

Dava Türü: Rüst iddiası ve mal talebi

---------------------------------------------------

Sayfa No: 154

Dava No: 518

Dava Türü: Tereke

---------------------------------------------------

Sayfa No: 156

Dava No: 519

Dava Türü: Tereke

----------------------------------------------------

Sayfa No: 174

Dava No: 546

Dava Türü: Mehir

-----------------------------------------------------

KKTC YAKIN DOĞU ÜNİVERSİTESİ EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ

OSMANLICA PALEOGRAFYASI VE ARŞİVCİLİK EĞİTİMİ

ANA BİLİM DALI

1911-1916 YILLARI ARASI ŞER´ İYE SİCİLİ

(Dava No: 333-564)

YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ

Özin REYHAN

Tez Danışmanı

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ömer YARAŞIR

Lefkoşa, 2004

Sayfa No: 4

Dava No: 338

Dava Türü: Rüst iddiası ve mal talebi

(1) Kıbrıs cezîresinin merkez vilâyeti olan Lefkosa kazâsına mülhak Değirmenlik

kazâsına tâbi´ Luricina karyesi sâkinelerinden iken bundan akdem vefât iden (2)

Rahime bint-i Mehmed bin Yusuf’un sadrî oğlı ve hâlen yirmi bir yasını mütecâviz

olup âkil ve bâliğ ve bülûğuna rüsdi munzam oldığını iddi´â iden isbu bâ´isü’l-vesîka

(3) Seyyid Ali bin Kâmil meclis-i ser´-i serîf-i enverde mezbûrun pederi ve hâl-i

sigarında tesviye-i umûrına bâ-hüccet vasî-i mansûbı olmağla mâl-i mevrûsına bi’lvesâye

vaz´-ı yedi mütehakkık (4) olan Kâmil bin Seyyid Ali mahzarında üzerine

da´vâ ve takrîr-i kelâm idüp hâlen ben yirmi bir yasımı tecâvüz idüp âkil ve bâliğ ve

bülûğuma rüsdüm munzam olup umûrumı bi-nefsihi rü´yete (5) kâdir ve i´ânet-i

vasîden müstağnî olmamla vâlidem müteveffât-ı mezbûre Rahime’den mevrûs bermûcib-

i defter-i kassâm mâlımı pederim ve vasîm mezbûr Kâmil’den hâlen taleb

iderim su`âl olunup (6) bana teslîme kıbel-i ser´den pederim vasî-i mezbûra tenbîh

olunmak murâdımdır didükde gıbbe’s-su`âl ol dahi cevâbında müdde´î-i mezbûrun

ber-mûcib-i defter-i mezkûr mâl-i mevrûsına bi’l-vesâye (7) vaz´-ı yedini ikrâr idüp

lâkin müdde´î-i mezbûrun ber-minvâl-i muharrer rüsd müdde´âsını inkâr idicek

müdde´î-i mezbûr Seyyid Ali’den vech-i mesrûh üzere müdde´âsına beyyine (8)

taleb olundukda ´udûl-i ahrâr-ı ricâl-i Müslimînden ve karye-i mezbûre sâkinlerinden

Mustafa bin Hüseyin ve Yusuf bin Mehmed nâm kimesneler li-ecli’s-sehâde meclis-i

ser´e (9) hâzırân olup eserü’l-istishâd fi’l-hakîka isbu müdde´î-i mezbûr Seyyid Ali

el-yevm yirmi bir yasını tecâvüz idüp âkil ve bâliğ ve bülûğuna rüsdi munzam (10)

olup umûrını bi-nefsihi rü´yete kâdir ve i´ânet-i vasîden müstağnîdir biz bu husûsa

bu vech üzere sâhidlerüz sehâdet dahi iderüz diyü her biri (11) bi’l-muvâcehe edâ-i

sehâdet-i ser´iyye itdüklerinden sonra sâhidân-ı mezbûrân Mustafa bin Hüseyin ve

Yusuf bin Mehmed Ağalar usûl-i mevzû´asına tevfîkan (12) sırran ve ´alenen lede’ttezkiye

´adl ve makbûlü’s-sehâde idükleri ihbâr olunmağın mûcibiyle müdde´î-i

mezbûr Seyyid Ali’nin rüsdine ba´de’l-hükm ve’t-tenbîh mâ-vaka´ (13) bi’t-taleb ketb olundı harrere fi’l-yevmi’l-hâmis ´aser min sehri Cemâdiyi’l-âhir li-seneti ´isrîn

ve selâse mi`eten ve elf.

Sühûdü’l-hâl

Mahkeme Kâtibi Mehmed Nazım Efendi

Odacı Hasan Ağa

Zabtiyye Mustafa

*****************************************************

Sayfa No: 154

Dava No: 518

Dava Türü: Tereke

(1) Kıbrıs cezîresinin merkez vilâyeti olan Lefkosa kazâsına mülhak Değirmenlik

nâhiyesine tâbi´ Luricina karyesi sâkinelerinden iken efrencî bin dokuz yüz (2) bes

senesi Eylül’ünün onuncu günü vefât iden Mustafa bin Osman’ın verâseti zevce-i

menkûhe-i metrûkesi Tuti bint-i Yusuf ve pederi mezbûr (3) Osman bin Mustafa ile

vâlidesi Emine Kara Hasan ve sulbî sagîr oğulları Osman ve Yusuf ve Hasan’a

münhasıra oldığı bi’l-ihbâr ´inde’s-ser´i’l-enver (4) zâhir ve mütehakkık oldukdan

sonra sigâr-ı mezbûrûnun vakt-i rüsd ve sedâdlarına değin tesviye-i umûrlarına kıbeli

ser´den vasî nasb ve ta´yîn (5) olunan vâlideleri mezbûre Tuti verese-i kibâr

ma´rifetleri ve ma´rifet-i ser´le tahrîr ve bey´ ve beyne’l-vereseti’l-mezbûre tevzî´ ve

taksîm olunan (6) müteveffâ-yı mezbûrun terekesi defteridir ki ber-vech-i âtî zikr ve

beyân olunur harrere fi’l-yevmi’s-sâmin ´aser min sehri Sa´bâni’l-mu´azzam li-seneti

selâse ve ´isrîn (7) ve selâse mi`eten ve elf.

(8) sandalye 10/81

çuval 1/54

besli kuzu 1/144

dağarcık 1/12

def´a dağarcık 1/13

def´a dağarcık 1/3

bir parça ip /2.20 para

terâzî 1 - timür kaya 1/17

(9) sepet 3/3.10 para

kasayı 1/1

köfün 4/17

def´a köfün 1/6

def´a köfün 2/18

def´a köfün 3/20

binlik 1/5

kamıs köfün 2/5

(10) bakla fî 12/21

torba 1/9

def´a torba 1/4

sahtiyan çizme çift 1/5.10 para

değirmen 1/13.20 para

müsta´mel kebe 1/15

timür kürek 1/4

balta 1/10

(11) tahta kürek 1/12

çizme çift 1/126

çapa 1/7

semer çift 1/6

def´a semer 1/8

sapan 1/45

def´a sapan 1/36

boyunduruk 1/4

(12) kayıs 1/11

sapan timüri 3/3

orak 2/2

çapa sapı 1/2

def´a boyunduruk 1/9

bardak 1/3

çatal 3/9

zeytûn küpü 1/11

(13) su küpü 1/10

barastadu 1/11

büyük küp 1/15

sürgi 1/33

döğen 1/79

müsta´mel sapan 1/10

müsta´mel döğen /18

kancık merkeb ma´a sıpa 1/1170

(14) def´a kancık merkeb 1 - ma´a sıpa 1/1287

öküz 1/1557

bir mikdâr favta samanı /10

bir mikdâr yaba tası /40

yulaf kîl 55/550 fî/10

burçak kîl 10/248

(15) favta kîl 32/320 fî/10

küp 1/22

def´a küp 1/11

tahmînen otuz bes merteklik bir oda saman /729

sa´îr kîl 100/1350

hınta kîl 98/2793 fî/28

(16) bir mikdâr fıskı /135

sa´îr kîl 10/135

hınta kîl 10/285 fî/28

küp 2/23

def´a küp 2/30

çamasır teknesi 1/20

inek re`s 1/1080

(17) bir buçuk dönüm bağ /351

üç dönüm bağ /540

kerpiç 4300/380

Đbrahim’in zimmetinde olup tahsîl olunan /36

Luricina karyeli Ali Đsmail zimmetinde müteveffâ-yı mezbûrun alacağı olup Avukat

Ahalliya Efendi ma´rifetiyle tahsîl olunan /1096

(18) yine karye-i mezbûreli Arif Süleyman zimmetinde müteveffâ-yı mezbûrun

alacağı olup tahsîl olunan /1187

cem´an yekûnü’l-mezkûrât /16343

(19) minha’l-ihrâcât

(20) deyn-i müsbet zevce-i mezbûre Tuti’nin mehr-i mü`eccel bâ-sehâdet Arif bin

Sarı Hüseyin ve Đsmail bin Đbrahim ba´de’t-tezkiye /1501

hamâliye ve zâhire ölçmek ücreti /45

muhtâriyye /18

tezkere parası /6

(21) giden me`mûrun hayvân kirâsıyla masârif-ı sâ`iresi /89

hükûmete ´â`id dellâliyye /210

münâdiye virilen /67

yekûnü’l-mezkûrât /1937

(22) sahhü’l-bâkî li’t-taksîm beyne’l-vereseti’l-mezbûre /14406

(23) hisse-i zevce-i mezbûre Tuti /1801

hisse-i eb-i mezbûr Osman /2401

hisse-i ümm-i mezbûre Emine /2401

hisse-i sagîr-i mezbûr Osman

2601

- 68 resm-i kısmet ma´a kaydiyye

2533

(24) hisse-i sagîr-i mezbûr Yusuf

2601

- 38 kezâ

2533

hisse-i sagîr-i mezbûr Hasan

2601

- 68 kezâ

2533

(25) verese-i kibâr hisselerini kâmilen ahz eyledikleri gibi sigâr-ı mezbûrûnun

hisseleri olan yedi bin bes yüz toksan gurûs (26) li-ecli’l-hıfz ve’l-istirbâh Lefkosa

eytâm emvâli sandığına irsâl kılındığı serh virildi

*********************************************************************************

Sayfa No: 156

Dava No: 519

Dava Türü: Tereke

(1) Kıbrıs cezîresinin merkez vilâyeti olan Lefkosa kazâsına mülhak Değirmenlik

nâhiyesine tâbi´ Luricina karyesi sâkinelerinden iken efrencî bin dokuz yüz bes

senesi sehr-i Eylül’ün (2) besinci günü vefât iden Hadice bint-i Yusuf Onbası’nın

verâseti vâlidesi Rahime bint-i Bosnak Mehmed ile pederi mezbûr Yusuf Onbası ve

sadrî sagîr oğlı Mustafa’ya (3) münhasıra oldığı bi’l-ihbâr ´inde’s-ser´i’l-enver zâhir

374

ve mütehakkık oldukdan sonra sagîr-i mezbûrun vakt-i rüsd ve sedâdına değin

tesviye-i umûrına kıbel-i ser´den vasî nasb (4) ve ta´yîn olunan ceddi mezbûr Yusuf

Onbası ma´rifeti ve ma´rifet-i ser´le tahrîr ve bey´ olunan müteveffât-ı mezbûrenin

terekesi defteridir ki ber-vech-i âtî zikr ve beyân olunur harrere (5) fi’l-yevmi’lhâmis

´aser min sehri Sa´bâni’l-mu´azzam li-seneti selâse ve ´isrîn ve selâse mi`eten

ve elf.

(6) etmek tahtası 1/18

bir kulblu tava 1/15

iki kulblu tava 1/26

tas 1/10

tabak 22/29

büyük tencere 1/103

hamur teknesi 1/72

tırabeza 2/20

(7) yün yatak 1 - sandık 1 - yorgan 1 - yasdık 2 - âyîne 1/360

yekûnü’l-mezkûrât /653

(8) minha’l-ihrâcât

(9) dellâliyye

15

- 4 münâdiye virilen

11

muhtâriyye /18

yekûnü’l-ihrâcât /33

(10) sahhü’l-bâkî li’t-taksîm beyne’l-vereseti’l-mezbûre /620

(11) hisse-i eb-i mezbûr Yusuf Onbası /103

hisse-i ümm-i mezbûre Rahime /103

hisse-i sagîr-i mezbûr Mustafa /404

(12) müteveffât-ı mezbûrenin peder ve vâlidesi hisse-i irsiyyeleri olan iki yüz altı

gurûs ahz ü kabz eyledikleri gibi sagîr-i mezbûr Mustafa’nın hisse-i irsiyyesi (13)

olan dört yüz dört gurûs li-ecli’l-hıfz ve’l-istirbâh eytâm emvâli sandığına

gönderildiği isbu mahalle serh virildi.

******************************************************************

Sayfa No: 174

Dava No: 546

Dava Türü: Mehir

(1) Kıbrıs cezîresinin merkez vilâyeti olan Lefkosa kazâsına mülhak Değirmenlik

nâhiyesine tâbi´ Luricina karyesi sâkinelerinden zâtı ta´rîf-i ser´î ile (2) ma´rife isbu

bâ´isetü’l-vesîka Ayse bint-i Yusuf nâm hatun meclis-i ser´-i serîf-i enverde zevci

Eklisiya karyeli müteveffâ Abdülkadir bin Osman’ın sulbî sagîr (3) oğulları Ömer ve

Osman’ın vasî-i mansûbları Lefkosalı Mehmed Nazım Efendi bin Hâcı Hüseyin Ağa

muvâcehesinde takrîr-i kelâm ve ta´bîr ´ani’l-merâm idüp zevcim (4) müteveffâ-yı

mezbûr Abdülkadir hâl-i hayâtında bundan altı sene mukaddem bes yüz bir gurûs

mehr-i mü`eccel ve bes yüz bir gurûs mehr-i mu´accel makbûz tesmiyesiyle beni

kendüye (5) tezervüc ve kabûl idüp ´akd-i nikâh beynimizde kâ`im iken mehr-i

mü`eccel-i mezkûr bes yüz bir gurûs bana kable’l-edâ fevt olmağla meblağ-ı mehr-i

mü`eccel-i (6) mezkûr bes yüz bir gurûs zevcim müteveffâ-yı mezbûrun emvâl-i

metrûkesinden olarak taleb iderim diyü ba´de’d-da´vâ ve’l-inkâr müdde´iye-i

mezbûre Ayse Hatun ber-minvâl-i (7) muharrer müdde´âsını ´udûl-i ahrâr-ı

Müslimînden varaka-ı mestûre ile her biri mahallinden evvelâ sırran ve ba´dehu

´alenen lede’t-tezkiye ´adl ve makbûlü’s-sehâde idükleri ihbâr (8) olunan Luricina

karyeli Mustafa bin Ramazan ve Yusuf bin Ali sehâdetleriyle bi’l-muvâcehe bernehc-

i ser´î ba´de’l-isbât ve’l-half mûcibiyle meblağ mehr-i mü`eccel-i (9) mezkûr

bes yüz bir gurûs müteveffâ-yı mezbûrun emvâl-i metrûke-i vâfiyesinden müdde´iyei

mezbûre Ayse Hatun edâ ve teslîme vasî-i mûmâ-ileyh Mehmed Nazım Efendi’ye

tenbîh (10) olundığı i´lâm ve tescîl olundı harrere fi’l-yevmi’t-tâsi´ ve’l-´isrîn min

sehri Saferi’l-hayr li-seneti erba´ ve ´isrîn ve selâse mi`eten ve elf.